I have tried LightVC and CoughPHP. I use Windows. After many unsuccessful attempts, I finally succeeded. The article you write does not help me. I want to give some information for you.

1. LightVC and CoughPHP Maintainers seem unresponsive to the visitors request. These visitors are potential users of both. You should pay attention to this potential users coming from Windows environment, if you want your work widespread. You already know that more Windows users than Mac users (like it or not). Working in a Windows environment is different then in the MacOS. So you should write articles related to Windows.

2. Why this tutorial is not on the official website of CoughPHP or LightVC. This kind articles is very important in the offical website. Without this, the credibility of both sites is dropped. I found this article through Google. You certainly can imagine when visitors of both sites did not seek other information. In my opinion, they will lose interest. Moreover, they will realize that very little information is available out there.

3. Folders that exist in CoughPHP package are confusing. There is no information on what folders contain library and what folders contain examples. It took me days just to find out where it should be placed in LighVC structure. Give enough information so that other people do not spend a long time for something simple.

4. I’ve read LightVC and CoughPHP. LightVC is very simple and its maintainers do the right work to make it as easy as possible. I can learn it easily. CoughPHP is also simple. But because too many files and organized in several folders, I was a little difficult to learn. CoughPHP must imitate the simplicity LighVC, if necessary, make it into one file.

5. I always fail to use CoughPHP generator (/scripts/cough). Finally I changed the script to be used. This is bad thing. In my opinion, the script must be changed into an interactive one, so users can enter the parameters later, if they fail to give previously.

Avril Benedict
polish escort in warsaw